0
Research Papers

Flow Boiling Heat Transfer and Pressure Drops of R1234ze(E) in a Silicon Micro-pin Fin Evaporator

[+] Author and Article Information
C. Falsetti

Laboratory of Heat and Mass Transfer (LTCM),
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne (EPFL),
Station 9,
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
e-mail: chiara.falsetti@epfl.ch

M. Magnini

Laboratory of Heat and Mass Transfer (LTCM),
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne (EPFL),
Station 9,
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
e-mail: mirco.magnini@epfl.ch

J. R. Thome

Laboratory of Heat and Mass Transfer (LTCM),
Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de
Lausanne (EPFL),
Station 9,
Lausanne CH-1015, Switzerland
e-mail: john.thome@epfl.ch

Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received February 27, 2017; final manuscript received June 21, 2017; published online July 10, 2017. Assoc. Editor: Mehdi Asheghi.

J. Electron. Packag 139(3), 031008 (Jul 10, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: EP-17-1023; doi: 10.1115/1.4037152 History: Received February 27, 2017; Revised June 21, 2017

The development of newer and more efficient cooling techniques to sustain the increasing power density of high-performance computing systems is becoming one of the major challenges in the development of microelectronics. In this framework, two-phase cooling is a promising solution for dissipating the greater amount of generated heat. In the present study, an experimental investigation of two-phase flow boiling in a micro-pin fin evaporator is performed. The micro-evaporator has a heated area of 1 cm2 containing 66 rows of cylindrical in-line micro-pin fins with diameter, height, and pitch of, respectively, 50 μm, 100 μm, and 91.7 μm. The working fluid is R1234ze(E) tested over a wide range of conditions: mass fluxes varying from 750 kg/m2 s to 1750 kg/m2 s and heat fluxes ranging from 20 W/cm2 to 44 W/cm2. The effects of saturation temperature on the heat transfer are investigated by testing three different outlet saturation temperatures: 25 °C, 30 °C, and 35 °C. In order to assess the thermal–hydraulic performance of the current heat sink, the total pressure drops are directly measured, while local values of heat transfer coefficient are evaluated by coupling high-speed flow visualization with infrared temperature measurements. According to the experimental results, the mass flux has the most significant impact on the heat transfer coefficient while heat flux is a less influential parameter. The vapor quality varies in a range between 0 and 0.45. The heat transfer coefficient in the subcooled region reaches a maximum value of about 12 kW/m2 K, whilst in two-phase flow it goes up to 30 kW/m2 K.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic of the experimental flow loop

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Test section top side (a), bottom side (b), micro-pin fins geometry and configuration of the heated area (c and d)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Experimental repeatability of the heat transfer coefficient versus vapor quality

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Total single-phase pressure drops versus mass flux

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Friction factor versus Reynolds number

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Average Nusselt number versus Reynolds number. Comparison with existing correlations.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Total two-phase pressure drop versus outlet vapor quality varying the test conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

(a) Micro-evaporator base temperature measured with the IR camera, (b) corresponding heat transfer coefficient calculated with the explained data reduction, (c) screenshot from the high-speed camera, and (d) local heat transfer coefficient averaged along the widthwise direction, under the test conditions of G = 1000 kg/m2 s, q = 28 W/cm2, and Tsat = 35 °C. Flow is from the left to the right.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Local heat transfer coefficient versus vapor quality. Effects of heat flux when G = 1000 kg/m2 s (a), and G = 1500 kg/m2 s (b). Tsat = 35 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Local heat transfer coefficient versus vapor quality. Effects of mass flux when q = 28 W/cm2 (a), and G = 40 W/cm2 (b). Tsat = 35 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Local heat transfer coefficient along the streamwise direction, with flow visualization screenshots obtained by means of the high-speed camera. Tsat = 35 °C.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Local heat transfer coefficient versus vapor quality. Effects of the outlet saturation temperature. Test conditions: G = 1500 kg/m2 s, q = 40 W/cm2.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In