0
Research Papers

Hotspot Thermal Management With Flow Boiling of Refrigerant in Ultrasmall Microgaps

[+] Author and Article Information
Mohamed H. Nasr, Craig E. Green, Peter A. Kottke, Yogendra K. Joshi

George W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332

Xuchen Zhang, Thomas E. Sarvey, Muhannad S. Bakir

School of Electrical and Computer Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332

Andrei G. Fedorov

George W. Woodruff School
of Mechanical Engineering,
Georgia Institute of Technology,
Atlanta, GA 30332
e-mail: AGF@gatech.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received August 12, 2016; final manuscript received November 30, 2016; published online January 5, 2017. Assoc. Editor: M. Baris Dogruoz.

J. Electron. Packag 139(1), 011006 (Jan 05, 2017) (8 pages) Paper No: EP-16-1097; doi: 10.1115/1.4035387 History: Received August 12, 2016; Revised November 30, 2016

As integration levels increase in next generation electronics, high power density devices become more susceptible to hotspot formation, which often imposes a thermal limitation on performance. Flow boiling of R134a in two microgap heat sink configurations was investigated as a solution for hotspot thermal management: a bare microgap and inline micro-pin fin populated microgap, both with 10 μm gap height, were tested in terms of their ability to dissipate heat fluxes approaching 5 kW/cm2 at the heat source. Additional parameters investigated include mass fluxes up to 3000 kg/m2 s at inlet pressures up to 1.5 MPa and exit qualities approaching unity. The microgap testbeds investigated consist of a silicon layer which is heated from the bottom using resistive heaters and capped with glass to enable visual observation of two-phase flow regimes. Wall temperature, device thermal resistance, and pressure drop results are presented and mapped to the dominant flow regimes that were observed in the microgap.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2017 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Hamann, H. F. , Weger, A. , Lacey, J. A. , Hu, Z. , Bose, P. , Cohen, E. , and Wakil, J. , 2007, “ Hotspot-Limited Microprocessors: Direct Temperature and Power Distribution Measurements,” IEEE J. Solid-State Circuits, 42(1), pp. 56–65. [CrossRef]
Alam, T. , Lee, P. S. , Yap, C. R. , and Jin, L. , 2012, “ Experimental Investigation of Local Flow Boiling Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics in Microgap Channel,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 42, pp. 164–174. [CrossRef]
Tuckerman, D. B. , and Pease, R. F. , 1981, “ High-Performance Heat Sinking for VLSI,” IEEE Electron Device Lett., 2(5), pp. 126–129. [CrossRef]
Peles, Y. , Koşar, A. , Mishra, C. , Kuo, C. J. , and Schneider, B. , 2005, “ Forced Convective Heat Transfer Across a Pin Fin Micro Heat Sink,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 48(17), pp. 3615–3627. [CrossRef]
Brunschwiler, T. , Paredes, S. , Drechsler, U. , Michel, B. , Cesar, W. , Töral, G. , Temiz, Y. , and Leblebici, Y. , 2009, “ Validation of the Porous-Medium Approach to Model Interlayer-Cooled 3D-Chip Stacks,” IEEE International Conference on 3D System Integration (3DIC), San Francisco, CA, Sept. 28–30, pp. 1–10.
Chang, K. H. , and Pan, C. , 2007, “ Two-Phase Flow Instability for Boiling in a Microchannel Heat Sink,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 50(11), pp. 2078–2088. [CrossRef]
Hetsroni, G. , Mosyak, A. , Pogrebnyak, E. , and Segal, Z. , 2006, “ Periodic Boiling in Parallel Micro-Channels at Low Vapor Quality,” Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 32(10), pp. 1141–1159. [CrossRef]
Kandlikar, S. G. , 2002, “ Fundamental Issues Related to Flow Boiling in Minichannels and Microchannels,” Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 26(2), pp. 389–407. [CrossRef]
Bar-Cohen, A. , Sheehan, J. R. , and Rahim, E. , 2012, “ Two-Phase Thermal Transport in Microgap Channels—Theory, Experimental Results, and Predictive Relations,” Microgravity Sci. Technol., 24(1), pp. 1–15. [CrossRef]
Alam, T. , Lee, P. S. , Yap, C. R. , and Jin, L. , 2013, “ A Comparative Study of Flow Boiling Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop Characteristics in Microgap and Microchannel Heat Sink and an Evaluation of Microgap Heat Sink for Hotspot Mitigation,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 58(1), pp. 335–347. [CrossRef]
Koşar, A. , and Peles, Y. , 2007, “ Boiling Heat Transfer in a Hydrofoil-Based Micro Pin Fin Heat Sink,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 50(5), pp. 1018–1034. [CrossRef]
Reeser, A. , Bar-Cohen, A. , and Hetsroni, G. , 2014, “ High Quality Flow Boiling Heat Transfer and Pressure Drop in Microgap Pin Fin Arrays,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 78, pp. 974–985. [CrossRef]
Krishnamurthy, S. , and Peles, Y. , 2008, “ Flow Boiling of Water in a Circular Staggered Micro-Pin Fin Heat Sink,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 51(5), pp. 1349–1364. [CrossRef]
Isaacs, S. A. , Kim, Y. J. , McNamara, A. J. , Joshi, Y. , Zhang, Y. , and Bakir, M. S. , 2012, “ Two-Phase Flow and Heat Transfer in Pin-Fin Enhanced Micro-Gaps,” 13th IEEE Intersociety Conference on Thermal and Thermomechanical Phenomena in Electronic Systems (ITherm), San Diego, CA, May 30–June 1, pp. 1084–1089.
Law, M. , Lee, P. S. , and Balasubramanian, K. , 2014, “ Experimental Investigation of Flow Boiling Heat Transfer in Novel Oblique-Finned Microchannels,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., 76, pp. 419–431. [CrossRef]
Bar-Cohen, A. , and Rahim, E. , 2009, “ Modeling and Prediction of Two-Phase Microgap Channel Heat Transfer Characteristics,” Heat Transf. Eng., 30(8), pp. 601–625. [CrossRef]
Rahim, E. , and Bar-Cohen, A. , 2010, “ Parametric Dependence of Annular Flow Heat Transfer in Microgaps,” 14th International Heat Transfer Conference, Washington, DC, Aug. 8–13, ASME Paper No. IHTC14-23315.
Kim, D. W. , Rahim, E. , Bar-Cohen, A. , and Han, B. , 2010, “ Direct Submount Cooling of High-Power LEDs,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol., 33(4), pp. 698–712. [CrossRef]
Gbur, A. M. , 2005, “ Determination of Dielectric Properties of Refrigerants,” ASHRAE Trans., 111(1), pp. 26–36.
Green, C. , Kottke, P. , Han, X. , Woodrum, C. , Sarvey, T. , Asrar, P. , Zhang, X. , Joshi, Y. , Fedorov, A. , Sitaraman, S. , and Bakir, M. , 2015, “ A Review of Two-Phase Forced Cooling in Three-Dimensional Stacked Electronics: Technology Integration,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 137(4), p. 040802. [CrossRef]
Nasr, M. H. , Green, C. , Kottke, P. A. , Zhang, X. , Sarvey, T. E. , Joshi, Y. K. , Bakir, M. S. , and Fedorov, A. G. , 2016, “ Flow Regimes and Convective Heat Transfer of Refrigerant Flow Boiling in Ultra-Small Microgaps,” Int. J. Heat Mass Transf., (accepted).

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Overview of bare microgap and pin fin microgap devices

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Schematic of experimental system

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Exploded view of test section and hermetic package. Flow visualization obtained from a top-down view of the microgap with microscope. Flow visualization was obtained from a top-down view of the microgap with microscope.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Vapor plume and liquid slug flow regime visualization in bare microgap device

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Vapor plume and liquid slug flow regime visualization in pin fin microgap device

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Wall temperature versus microgap wall heat flux for the bare microgap and pin fin microgap at (a) 2000 kg/m2 s and (b) 3000 kg/m2 s mapped into flow regimes described in Figs. 4 and5

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Comparison of device thermal resistance versus heater heat flux between the bare microgap and pin devices at: (a) G = 1000 kg/m2 s, (b) G = 2000 kg/m2 s, and (c) G = 3000 kg/m2 s, mapped into flow regimes described in Figs. 4 and 5. The dashed arrows represent expected trends of thermal resistance trends beyond the tested heat fluxes showing that thermal resistance would continue to increase as the liquid film wetting the microgap surface dries out. Note that no liquid slugs were observed in the pin fin microgap at 3000 kg/m2 s.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Pressure drop versus heat flux (a) bare microgap device and (b) pin fin device at 820 kPa system pressure (downstream of microgap). Dashed lines indicate flow regime transitions. “VP” denotes vapor plume domain and “LS” denotes liquid slug domain.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Pumping power versus heater heat flux in the bare microgap and pin fin microgap at a mass flux of 3000 kg/m2 s in the vapor plume regime

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In