0
Research Papers

Modular Microfluidic Filters Based on Transparent Membranes

[+] Author and Article Information
E. Archibong, H. Tuazon, H. Wang, J. Winskas

Innovative Biomedical Instruments
and Systems (IBIS) Laboratory,
Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering,
University of South Florida,
4202 E. Fowler Avenue,
Tampa, FL 33620

A. L. Pyayt

Innovative Biomedical Instruments
and Systems (IBIS) Laboratory,
Department of Chemical and Biomedical Engineering,
University of South Florida,
4202 E. Fowler Avenue,
Tampa, FL 33620
e-mail: pyayt@usf.com

Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received March 12, 2016; final manuscript received August 1, 2016; published online August 19, 2016. Assoc. Editor: Satish Chaparala.

J. Electron. Packag 138(4), 041002 (Aug 19, 2016) (6 pages) Paper No: EP-16-1049; doi: 10.1115/1.4034369 History: Received March 12, 2016; Revised August 01, 2016

We propose a new approach to the modular packaging of microfluidic components, in which different functional components are not only fabricated separately but are also designed to be individually removable for the purposes of replacement or subsequent analysis. In this paper, we demonstrate one such component: a stand-alone microfluidic filter that can be custom-fabricated and then connected, disconnected, and replaced on a microfluidic chip as needed. This filter is also designed such that particles captured on the filter can be further analyzed or processed directly on the filter itself—for example, for microscopic examination or cell culturing. The filter is a thin (1 μm) transparent silicon nitride membrane that can be designed and fabricated according to specifications for different applications. This material is suitable for microscale fabrication; filtration of a variety of solutions, including biological samples; and subsequent particle imaging and processing. The porous nature of the thin filter allows for particle separation under relatively low pressures, thus protecting the particles from rupture or membrane damage. We describe two methods for integrating the filter apparatus onto a microfluidic chip such that it can be inserted, removed, and replaced. To demonstrate the utility of this approach, we fabricated custom-designed silicon-based filters, incorporated them onto microfluidic systems then filtered microparticles and live cells from test solutions, and finally removed the filters to image the microparticles and culture the cells directly on the filter membranes.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2016 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Thorsen, T. , Maerkl, S. J. , and Quake, S. R. , 2002, “ Microfluidic Large-Scale Integration,” Science, 298(5593), pp. 580–584. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hofmann, O. , Wang, X. , Cornwell, A. , Beecher, S. , Raja, A. , Bradley, D. D. , Demello, A. J. , and Demello, J. C. , 2006, “ Monolithically Integrated Dye-Doped PDMS Long-Pass Filters for Disposable On-Chip Fluorescence Detection,” Lab Chip, 6(8), pp. 981–987. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Sia, S. K. , and Whitesides, G. M. , 2003, “ Microfluidic Devices Fabricated in Poly (Dimethylsiloxane) for Biological Studies,” Electrophoresis, 24(21), pp. 3563–3576. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Yager, P. , Edwards, T. , Fu, E. , Helton, K. , Nelson, K. , Tam, M. R. , and Weigl, B. H. , 2006, “ Microfluidic Diagnostic Technologies for Global Public Health,” Nature, 442(7101), pp. 412–418. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Trolio, W. M. , and Coville, W. E. , 2000, “ Pre-Analytical Specimen Preparation,” J. Assoc. Lab. Autom., 5(1), pp. 72–78. [CrossRef]
Brody, J. P. , Osborn, T. D. , Forster, F. K. , and Yager, P. , 1996, “ A Planar Microfabricated Fluid Filter,” Sens. Actuators, A, 54(1), pp. 704–708. [CrossRef]
VanDelinder, V. , and Groisman, A. , 2006, “ Separation of Plasma From Whole Human Blood in a Continuous Cross-Flow in a Molded Microfluidic Device,” Anal. Chem., 78(11), pp. 3765–3771. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Crowley, T. A. , and Pizziconi, V. , 2005, “ Isolation of Plasma From Whole Blood Using Planar Microfilters for Lab-on-a-Chip Applications,” Lab Chip, 5(9), pp. 922–929. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hou, H. W. , Bhagat, A. A. S. , Lee, W. C. J. , Huang, S. , Han, J. , and Lim, C. T. , 2011, “ Microfluidic Devices for Blood Fractionation,” Micromachines, 2(3), pp. 319–343. [CrossRef]
Lapizco-Encinas, B. H. , Davalos, R. V. , Simmons, B. A. , Cummings, E. B. , and Fintschenko, Y. , 2005, “ An Insulator-Based (Electrodeless) Dielectrophoretic Concentrator for Microbes in Water,” J. Microbiol. Methods, 62(3), pp. 317–326. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Ali, S. , Perez-Pardo, M. A. , Aucamp, J. P. , Craig, A. , Bracewell, D. G. , and Baganz, F. , 2012, “ Characterization and Feasibility of a Miniaturized Stirred Tank Bioreactor to Perform E. coli High Cell Density Fed-Batch Fermentations,” Biotechnol. Prog., 28(1), pp. 66–75. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Saunders, K. C. , Ghanem, A. , Hon, W. B. , Hilder, E. F. , and Haddad, P. R. , 2009, “ Separation and Sample Pre-Treatment in Bioanalysis Using Monolithic Phases: A Review,” Anal. Chim. Acta, 652(1), pp. 22–31. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Guirguis, R. A. , 2001, “ Liquid Specimen Container and Attachable Testing Modules,” U.S. Patent No. US 6509164B1.
Choi, S. , Song, S. , Choi, C. , and Park, J. K. , 2007, “ Continuous Blood Cell Separation by Hydrophoretic Filtration,” Lab Chip, 7(11), pp. 1532–1538. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Xuan, X. , Zhu, J. , and Church, C. , 2010, “ Particle Focusing in Microfluidic Devices,” Microfluid. Nanofluid., 9(1), pp. 1–16. [CrossRef]
Tsutsui, H. , and Ho, C.-M. , 2009, “ Cell Separation by Non-Inertial Force Fields in Microfluidic Systems,” Mech. Res. Commun., 36(1), pp. 92–103. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mohamed, H. , Murray, M. , Turner, J. N. , and Caggana, M. , 2009, “ Isolation of Tumor Cells Using Size and Deformation,” J. Chromatogr. A, 1216(47), pp. 8289–8295. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Zheng, S. , Lin, H. , Liu, J. Q. , Balic, M. , Datar, R. , Cote, R. J. , and Tai, Y. C. , 2007, “ Membrane Microfilter Device for Selective Capture, Electrolysis and Genomic Analysis of Human Circulating Tumor Cells,” J. Chromatogr. A, 1162(2), pp. 154–161. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Hosokawa, M. , Hayata, T. , Fukuda, Y. , Arakaki, A. , Yoshino, T. , Tanaka, T. , and Matsunaga, T. , 2010, “ Size-Selective Microcavity Array for Rapid and Efficient Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells,” Anal. Chem., 82(15), pp. 6629–6635. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Tan, S. J. , Yobas, L. , Lee, G. Y. , Ong, C. N. , and Lim, C. T. , 2009, “ Microdevice for the Isolation and Enumeration of Cancer Cells From Blood,” Biomed. Microdevices, 11(4), pp. 883–892. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wilf, M. , and Bartels, C. , 2005, “ Optimization of Seawater RO Systems Design,” Desalination, 173(1), pp. 1–12. [CrossRef]
Yang, S. Y. , Park, J. , Yoon, J. , Ree, M. , Jang, S. K. , and Kim, J. K. , 2008, “ Virus Filtration Membranes Prepared From Nanoporous Block Copolymers With Good Dimensional Stability Under High Pressures and Excellent Solvent Resistance,” Adv. Funct. Mater., 18(9), pp. 1371–1377. [CrossRef]
Hearn, M. T. , Bishop, C. A. , Hancock, W. S. , Harding, D. R. K. , and Reynolds, G. D. , 1979, “ Application of Reversed Phase High Performance Liquid Chromatography in Solid Phase Peptide Synthesis: High Pressure Liquid Chromatography of Amino Acids Peptides and Proteins XIII. Part XII Ref. 2,” J. Liquid Chromatogr., 2(1), pp. 1–21. [CrossRef]
de Mello, A. J. , and Beard, N. , 2003, “ Focus. Dealing With ‘Real’ Samples: Sample Pre-Treatment in Microfluidic Systems,” Lab Chip, 3(1), pp. 11N–20N. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Coville, W. E. , and Loika, M. , 2006, “ Microfiltration Technology: A Sensible Approach to Automating Sample Preparation,” Am. Biotechnol. Lab., 24(8), p. 12.
Hamzah, A. A. , Zainal Abidin, H. E. , Yeop Majlis, B. , Mohd Nor, M. , Ismardi, A. , Sugandi, G. , Tiong, T. Y. , Dee, C. F. , and Yunas, J. , 2013, “ Electrochemically Deposited and Etched Membranes With Precisely Sized Micropores for Biological Fluids Microfiltration,” J. Micromech. Microeng., 23(7), p. 074007. [CrossRef]
Li, S. J. , Shen, C. , and Sarro, P. M. , 2011, “ A Buried Vertical Filter for Micro and Nanoparticle Filtration,” Procedia Eng., 25, pp. 1193–1196. [CrossRef]
Van Rijn, C. , van der Wekken, M. , Nijdam, W. , and Elwenspoek, M. , 1997, “ Deflection and Maximum Load of Microfiltration Membrane Sieves Made With Silicon Micromachining,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., 6(1), pp. 48–54. [CrossRef]
Krishnamurthy, S. , Bischoff, F. , Ann Mayer, J. , Wong, K. , Pham, T. , Kuerer, H. , Lodhi, A. , Bhattacharyya, A. , Hall, C. , and Lucci, A. , 2013, “ Discordance in HER2 Gene Amplification in Circulating and Disseminated Tumor Cells in Patients With Operable Breast Cancer,” Cancer Med., 2(2), pp. 226–233. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mossoba, M. , Al-Khaldi, S. F. , Jacobson, A. , Segarra Crowe, L. I. , and Fry, F. S. , 2003, “ Application of a Disposable Transparent Filtration Membrane to the Infrared Spectroscopic Discrimination Among Bacterial Species,” J. Microbiol. Methods, 55(1), pp. 311–314. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Wang, Y.-C. , Stevens, A. L. , and Han, J. , 2005, “ Million-Fold Preconcentration of Proteins and Peptides by Nanofluidic Filter,” Anal. Chem., 77(14), pp. 4293–4299. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Mohamed, H. , Turner, J. N. , and Caggana, M. , 2007, “ Biochip for Separating Fetal Cells From Maternal Circulation,” J. Chromatogr. A, 1162(2), pp. 187–192. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Lee, D. , Sukumar, P. , Mahyuddin, A. , Choolani, M. , and Xu, G. , 2010, “ Separation of Model Mixtures of Epsilon-Globin Positive Fetal Nucleated Red Blood Cells and Anucleate Erythrocytes Using a Microfluidic Device,” J. Chromatogr. A, 1217(11), pp. 1862–1866. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Huang, R. , Barber, T. A. , Schmidt, M. A. , Tompkins, R. G. , Toner, M. , Bianchi, D. W. , Kapur, R. , and Flejter, W. L. , 2008, “ A Microfluidics Approach for the Isolation of Nucleated Red Blood Cells (NRBCs) From the Peripheral Blood of Pregnant Women,” Prenatal Diagn., 28(10), pp. 892–899. [CrossRef]
Fiorini, G. S. , and Chiu, D. T. , 2005, “ Disposable Microfluidic Devices: Fabrication, Function, and Application,” BioTechniques, 38(3), pp. 429–446. [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Archibong, E. , Stewart, J. , and Pyayt, A. , 2015, “ Optofluidic Spectroscopy Integrated on Optical Fiber Platform,” Sens. Bio-Sens. Res., 3, pp. 1–6. [CrossRef]
Parsons, G. , Souk, J. , and Batey, J. , 1991, “ Low Hydrogen Content Stoichiometric Silicon Nitride Films Deposited by Plasma-Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition,” J. Appl. Phys., 70(3), pp. 1553–1560. [CrossRef]
Williams, K. R. , and Muller, R. S. , 1996, “ Etch Rates for Micromachining Processing,” J. Microelectromech. Syst., 5(4), pp. 256–269. [CrossRef]
Cheemalapati, S. , Ladanov, M. , Winskas, J. , and Pyayt, A. , 2014, “ Optimization of Dry Etching Parameters for Fabrication of Polysilicon Waveguides With Smooth Sidewall Using Capacitively Coupled Plasma Reactor,” Appl. Opt., 53(25), pp. 5745–5749. [CrossRef] [PubMed]

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Scanning electron microscope (SEM) image of a microfabricated filtering membrane device. The large square is a silicon membrane on the top (upstream) side of the wafer. It has a periodic array of holes. The smaller square, visible through the top membrane, is a membrane on the bottom (downstream) side of the wafer. This lower membrane has one circular hole in the middle.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

A 3-in. silicon wafer with multiple microfabricated filtering membranes of different dimensions and with different pore sizes

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Fabrication process for the transparent, reconfigurable microstrainer. (a) and (b) Low stress silicon nitride is deposited on both sides of a double-sided polished wafer. (c) Photoresist is spin-coated and exposed with photolithography to pattern pores in the membrane, (d) then followed by etching through the nitride layer using a reactive ion etcher. (e) The wafer is flipped, and the back side is similarly patterned using photolithography and etching to create a single large hole (rather than the pore array of topside). (f) To complete the fabrication, KOH is used to release the structure.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Water contact angle measured on the surface of the microfabricated membrane

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Two methods of integrating the exchangeable filter device into a microfluidic filter system: (a) In the first method, the filter (circled) is sandwiched between PDMS adapters with supporting glass slides with capillary tubes attached. (b) Close-up view of the filter membrane, showing its periodic array of pores, each 6 μm in diameter. (c) In the second method of integration, the whole microfluidic structure, including microfluidic channels, is moulded in PDMS. In this photograph, the fluid-carrying channels are oriented left-to-right. The membrane filter would be inserted into the insertion slot perpendicular to the channels. (d) A closer view of the membrane filter in place.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Three-dimensional model of one method of integrating the silicon membrane into a microfluidic filter. Left panel: The membrane is sandwiched between two protective polymer (PDMS) adapters. Right panel: Glass slides are attached to the outside ends of the polymer blocks, oriented perpendicular to the direction of fluid flow. Here, the filtering of a blood sample is shown, with whole blood entering from the left and cell-free plasma exiting to the right.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Demonstration of microfluidic filtration and imaging. (a) A concentrated solution of brown microspheres in distilled water flows in from the left, and clear filtrate flows out to the right. (b) Human lung fibroblast cells on a membrane, filtered from a buffer solution. Panels (c) and (d) show 20 μm microbeads captured on a membrane with 10 μm pores, with the microscope focused first on the beads (c) and then the membrane (d). Panels (e) and (f) are focused above and below the transparent membrane, respectively, to show that small particles can pass through the membrane.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Human lung fibroblast cells, captured and then grown for 3 days on the surface of the microfiltering membrane. (a) Optical microscopy image of the membrane with cells. (b) Green fluorescent image of the cells, demonstrating that all are alive.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In