Research Papers

Comparison of Electronic Component Durability Under Uniaxial and Multiaxial Random Vibrations

[+] Author and Article Information
Matthew Ernst

Applied Physics Laboratory,
Johns Hopkins University,
Laurel, MD 20723
e-mail: ernstm@gmail.com

Ed Habtour

Vehicle Technology Directorate,
U. S. Army Research Laboratory,
Aberdeen Proving Ground,
MD 21005
e-mail: ed.m.habtour.civ@mail.mil

Abhijit Dasgupta

Center for Advanced Life Cycle Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: dasgupta@umd.edu

Michael Pohland

U.S. Army Materiel System Activity Analysis,
Aberdeen Proving Ground,
MD 21005
e-mail: michael.f.pohland.civ@mail.mil

Mark Robeson

U.S. Army's Aviation Development
Directorate at Ft. Eustis,
Ft. Eustis, VA 23604
e-mail: mark.e.robeson.civ@mail.mil

Mark Paulus

Naval Undersea Warfare Center,
Keyport, WA 98345
e-mail: mark.paulus@navy.mil

Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received June 26, 2014; final manuscript received August 24, 2014; published online October 15, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Satish Chaparala.

This work is in part a work of the U.S. Government. ASME disclaims all interest in the U.S. Government's contributions.

J. Electron. Packag 137(1), 011009 (Oct 15, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: EP-14-1062; doi: 10.1115/1.4028516 History: Received June 26, 2014; Revised August 24, 2014

Multiaxial and uniaxial vibration experiments were conducted in order to study the differences in failure modes and fatigue life for the two types of excitation. An electrodynamic (ED) shaker capable of controlled vibration in six degrees of freedom (DOF) was employed for the experiments. The test specimen consisted of six large inductors insertion mounted on a printed wiring board (PWB). Average damage accumulation rate (DAR) in the inductor leads was measured for random excitations in-plane, out-of-plane, and both directions simultaneously. Under simultaneous multiaxial excitation, the average DAR was found to be 2.2 times greater than the sum of the in-plane and out-of-plane DARs. The conclusion was that multiple-step sequential uniaxial testing may significantly overestimate the durability of large/heavy structures with high center of mass in a multiaxial dynamic environment. Additionally, a test method utilizing uniaxial vibration along a direction other than the principal directions of the structure was examined. This method was found to have significant limitations, but showed better agreement with simultaneous multiaxial vibration experiments.

Copyright © 2015 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.


Habtour, E., Choi, C., Drake, G., Dasgupta, D., and Al-Bassyiouni, M., 2010, “Improved Reliability Testing With Multiaxial Electrodynamics Vibration,” 56th Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS), San Jose, CA, Jan. 25–28. [CrossRef]
Yu, D., Al-Yafawi, A., Nguyen, T. T., Park, S., and Chung, S., 2011, “High-Cycle Fatigue Life Prediction for Pb-Free BGA Under Random Vibration Loading,” Microelectron. Reliab., 51(3), pp. 649–656. [CrossRef]
Habtour, E., Connon, W., Pohland, M. F., Stanton, S. C., Paulus, M., and Dasgupta, A., 2014, “Review of Response and Damage of Linear and Nonlinear Systems Under Multiaxial Vibration,” Shock Vib. J., 2014, p. 294271. [CrossRef]
ISO, 2003, “Road Vehicles—Environmental Conditions and Testing for Electrical and Electronic Equipment,” International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, Standard No. ISO 16750.
Department of Defense, 2008, “Enviromental Engineering Considerations and Laboratory Tests,” U.S. Department of Defense, Washington, DC, Test Method Standard MIL-STD 810G.
Whiteman, W., and Berman, M. B., 2002, “Fatigue Failure Results for Multiaxial Versus Uniaxial Stress Screen Vibration Testing,” J. Shock Vib., 9(6), pp. 319–328. [CrossRef]
Himelblau, H., Hine, M., Frydman, A., and Barrett, P., 1995, “Effects of Triaxial and Uniaxial Random Excitation on the Vibration Response and Fatigue Damage of Typical Spacecraft Hardware,” 66th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Biloxi, MS, Oct. 30-Nov. 3.
French, R., Handy, R., and Cooper, H. L., 2006, “A Comparison of Simultaneous and Sequential Single-Axis Durability Testing,” Exp. Tech., 30(5), pp. 32–37. [CrossRef]
Gregory, D., Bitsie, F., and Smallwood, D., 2008, “Comparison of the Response of a Simple Structure to Single Axis and Multiple Axis Random Vibration Inputs,” 79th Shock and Vibration Symposium, Orlando, FL, Oct. 26–30.
Paulus, M., Dasgupta, A., and Habtour, E., 2012, “Life Estimation Model of a Cantilevered Beam Subjected to Complex Random Vibration,” Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 35(11), pp. 1058–1070. [CrossRef]
Yu, D., Al-Yafawi, A., Park, S., and Chung, S., 2010, “Finite Element Based Fatigue Life Prediction for Electronic Components Under Random Vibration Loading,” 60th Electronic Components and Technology Conference (ECTC), Las Vegas, NV, June 1–4, pp. 188–193. [CrossRef]
Habtour, E., Choi, C., Osterman, M., and Dasgupta, A., 2012, “Novel Approach to Improve Electronics Reliability in the Next Generation of U.S. Army Small Unmanned Ground Vehicles Under Complex Vibration Conditions,” J. Failure Anal. Prev., 12(1), pp. 86–95. [CrossRef]
U.S. Navy, 1979, “Navy Manufacturing Screening Program,” U.S. Department of the Navy, Naval Material Command, Standard No. NAVMAT P-9492, pp. 9–14.
Wirsching, P. H., Paez, T. L., and Ortiz, K., 1995, Random Vibrations: Theory and Practice, Wiley, New York.
Ernst, M., 2013, “Response and Durability of Large Radius of Gyration Structures Subjected to Biaxial Vibration,” M.S. thesis, Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Maryland, College Park, MD.
Worden, K., and Tomlinson, G. R., 2001, Nonlinearity in Structural Dynamics: Detection, Identification, and Modelling, Institute of Physics, Bristol, UK.
Balachandran, B., and Nayfeh, A. H., 1991, “Observations of Modal Interactions in Resonantly Forced Beam-Mass Structures,” Nonlinear Dyn., 2(2), pp. 77–117. [CrossRef]
Malatkar, P., and Nayfeh, A. H., 2003, “A Parametric Identification Technique for Single-Degree-of-Freedom Weakly Nonlinear Systems With Cubic Nonlinearities,” J. Vib. Control, 9(3–4), pp. 317–336. [CrossRef]
Kumar, V., Miller, K. J., and Rhoads, J. F., 2011, “Nonlinear Parametric Amplification and Attenuation in a Base-Excited Cantilever Beam,” J. Sound Vib., 330(22), pp. 5401–5409. [CrossRef]


Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Photograph of test specimen on shaker table

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Test specimen schematic

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

External view of inductor

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Inductor with shrink wrap removed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Inductor with tape wrap removed

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Inductor dimensions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Outside coil wrap (stiff lead)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Inside coil wrap (compliant lead)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Vibration mode VII

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Vibration mode VIII

Grahic Jump Location

MDOF shaker (partially disassembled)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Vibration power spectral density functions

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Single-axis and combined-axes (incoherent) average DARs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Multiaxial response amplification for component flexure in the x direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Comparison between combined multiaxial excitation and superposition at 0.78 Grms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Comparison between combined multiaxial excitation and superposition at 3.14 Grms

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 18

Measured PWB response in out-of-plane, z direction

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 19

Coherent and incoherent average DARs




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In