0
Research Papers

Adhesion and Puncture Strength of Polyurethane Coating Used to Mitigate Tin Whisker Growth

[+] Author and Article Information
Kenny Mahan, Yong Sun, Sungwon Han, Mike Osterman

Mechanical Engineering Department,
Center for Life Cycle Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742

Bongtae Han

Fellow ASME
Mechanical Engineering Department,
Center for Life Cycle Engineering,
University of Maryland,
College Park, MD 20742
e-mail: bthan@umd.edu

1Corresponding author.

Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received August 7, 2013; final manuscript received February 17, 2014; published online May 5, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Susan Lu.

J. Electron. Packag 136(3), 031004 (May 05, 2014) (7 pages) Paper No: EP-13-1084; doi: 10.1115/1.4026922 History: Received August 07, 2013; Revised February 17, 2014

Reliability of conformal coatings used to mitigate tin whisker growth depends on their ability to contain tin whiskers. Two key material properties required to assess the reliability of a polyurethane coating are documented experimentally: adhesion strength and puncture strength. A modified blister test using a predefined blister area is employed to assess the adhesion strength and a puncture test is employed to evaluate the puncture strength of the coating. After measuring the properties at time zero, the coatings are subjected to accelerated testing conditions (high temperature/humidity storage and temperature cycling) and the degradations of the coating properties are documented.

Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Schematic illustration of a modified blister test specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

3D view of (a) copper substrate and (b) copper plug mold

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Copper substrate with epoxy plugs

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Schematic cross sectional view of sample preparation process: (a) tin plated substrate and plug mold, (b) temporary mask and release agent application, (c) temporary shim for conformal coating curing, and (d) final blister test specimen

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Schematic diagram of the blister test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Blister test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Schematic diagram of the puncture test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Puncture test setup

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Typical pressure versus blister height results for the blister test of a polyurethane conformal coating before aging

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

Nonlinear regression results of the elastoplastic curve to determine the hardening constant and yield strength of the coating

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 11

Adhesion strength versus hours in a T/H chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 12

Adhesion strength versus cycles in a T/C chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 13

Typical load versus deflection results for the puncture test of a polyurethane conformal coating

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 14

Puncture strength versus hours in a T/H chamber

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 15

Schematic of tin whisker nucleating on tin coated substrate

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 16

Puncture force and buckling force versus whisker length

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 17

Critical whisker length for buckling versus whisker diameter

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In