0
Research Papers

UCPD Model for Pb-Free Solder

[+] Author and Article Information
Michael K. Neilsen

Mem. ASME
Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800, MS0346,
Albuquerque, NM 87185
e-mail: mkneils@sandia.gov

Paul T. Vianco

Sandia National Laboratories,
P.O. Box 5800, MS0889,
Albuquerque, NM 87185
e-mail: ptvianc@sandia.govl

Contributed by the Electronic and Photonic Packaging Division of ASME for publication in the JOURNAL OF ELECTRONIC PACKAGING. Manuscript received September 9, 2013; final manuscript received February 6, 2014; published online September 19, 2014. Assoc. Editor: Satish Chaparala.

J. Electron. Packag 136(4), 041006 (Sep 19, 2014) (8 pages) Paper No: EP-13-1101; doi: 10.1115/1.4026851 History: Received September 09, 2013; Revised February 06, 2014

A unified creep plasticity damage (UCPD) model for eutectic Sn-Pb and Pb-free solders was developed and implemented into finite element analysis codes. The new model will be described along with the relationship between the model's damage evolution equation and an empirical Coffin–Manson relationship for solder fatigue. Next, developments needed to model crack initiation and growth in solder joints will be described. Finally, experimentally observed cracks in typical solder joints subjected to thermal mechanical fatigue are compared with model predictions. Finite element based modeling is particularly suited for predicting solder joint fatigue of advanced electronics packaging, e.g. package-on-package (PoP), because it allows for evaluation of a variety of package materials and geometries.

FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2014 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Perkins, A. E., and Sitaraman, S. K., 2009, Solder Joint Reliability Predictions for Multiple Environments, Springer, New York.
Zhang, Q., and Dasgupta, A., 2005, “Systematic Study on Thermo-Mechanical Durability of Pb-Free Assemblies: Experiments and FE Analysis,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 127(4), pp. 415–429. [CrossRef]
Darveaux, R., 2002, “Effect of Simulation Methodology on Solder Joint Crack Growth Correlation and Fatigue Life Prediction,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 124(3), pp. 147–154. [CrossRef]
Towashiraporn, P., Subbarayan, G. S., and Desai, C. S., 2005, “A Hybrid Model for Computationally Efficient Fatigue Fracture Simulations at Microelectronic Assembly Interfaces,” Int. J. Solids Struct., 42(15), pp. 4468–4483. [CrossRef]
Bhate, D., Chan, D., Subbarayan, G., and Nguyen, L., 2008, “A Nonlinear Fracture Mechanics Approach to Modeling Fatigue Crack Growth in Solder Joints,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 130(2), p. 021003. [CrossRef]
Ladani, L. J., and Dasgupta, A., 2008, “Damage Initiation and Propagation in Voided Joints: Modeling and Experiment,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 130(1), p. 011008. [CrossRef]
Anand, L., 1985, “Constitutive Equations for Hot-Working of Metals,” Int. J. Plast., 1(3), pp. 213–231. [CrossRef]
Busso, E. P., Kitano, M., and Kumazawa, T., 1992, “A Visco-Plastic Constitutive Model for 60/40 Tin-Lead Solder Used in IC Package Joints,” Trans. ASME J. Eng. Mater. Technol., 114(3), pp. 331–337. [CrossRef]
Frear, D. R., Burchett, S. N., Neilsen, M. K., and Stephens, J. J., 1997, “Microstructurally Based Finite Element Simulation of Solder Joint Behaviour,” Soldering Surf. Mount Technol., 9(1), pp. 39–42. [CrossRef]
Nose, H., Sakane, M., Tsukada, Y., and Nishimura, H., 2003, “Temperature and Strain Rate Effects on Tensile Strength and Inelastic Constitutive Relationship of Sn-Pb Solders,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 125(1), pp. 59–66. [CrossRef]
Fossum, A. F., Vianco, P. T., Neilsen, M. K., and Pierce, D. M., 2006, “A Practical Viscoplastic Damage Model for Lead-Free Solder,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 128(1), pp. 71–81. [CrossRef]
Ohguchi, K. I., Sasaki, K., and Ishibashi, M., 2006, “A Quantitative Evaluation of Time-Independent and Time-Dependent Deformations of Lead-Free and Lead-Containing Solder Alloys,” J. Electron. Mater., 35(1), pp. 132–139. [CrossRef]
Sharma, P., and Dasgupta, A., 2002, “Micro-Mechanics of Creep-Fatigue Damage in Pb-Sn Solder Due To Thermal Cycling; Part I: Formulation; Part II: Mechanistic Insights and Cyclic Durability Predictions From Monotonic Data,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 124(3), pp. 292–298. [CrossRef]
Desai, C. S., Basaran, C., Dishongh, T., and Prince, J., 1998, “Thermomechanical Analysis in Electronic Packaging With Unified Constitutive Models for Materials and Joints,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Manuf. Technol., Part B, 21(1), pp. 87–97. [CrossRef]
Ladani, L., and Dasgupta, A., 2009, “A Meso-Scale Damage Evolution Model for Cyclic Fatigue of Viscoplastic Materials,” Int. J. Fatigue, 31(4), pp. 703–711. [CrossRef]
Boyce, G. L., Brewer, L. N., Neilsen, M. K., and Perricone, M. J., 2011, “On the Strain Rate and Temperature Dependent Tensile Behavior of Eutectic Sn-Pb Solder,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 133(3), p. 031009. [CrossRef]
Solomon, H., 1986, “Fatigue of 60/40 Solder,” IEEE Trans. Compon., Hybrids, Manuf. Technol., 9(4), pp. 423–432. [CrossRef]
Cuddalorepatta, G., and Dasgupta, A., 2005, “Cyclic Mechanical Durability of Sn3. 0Ag0. 5Cu Pb-Free Solder Alloy,” International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exhibition Paper, Orlando, FL, ASME Paper No. IMECE2005-81171. [CrossRef]
Zhou, Y., Al-Bassyiouni, M., and Dasgupta, A., 2009, “Vibration Durability Assessment of Sn3.0Ag0.5Cu and Sn37Pb Solders Under Harmonic Excitation,” ASME J. Electron. Packag., 131(1), p. 011016. [CrossRef]
Kariya, Y., and Otsuka, M., 1998, “Mechanical Fatigue Characteristics of Sn-3.5 Ag-x (x= Bi, Cu, Zn and In) Solder Alloys,” J. Electron. Mater., 27(11), pp. 1229–1235. [CrossRef]
Vianco, P. T., Rejent, J. A., and Kilgo, A. C., 2003, “Time-Independent Mechanical and Physical Properties of the Ternary 95.5 Sn-3.9 Ag-0.6 Cu Solder,” J. Electron. Mater., 32(3), pp. 142–151. [CrossRef]
More, J. J., 1978, “The Levenberg-Marquardt Algorithm: Implementation and Theory,” Biennial Conference on Numerical Analysis, Dundee, Scotland, June 28–July 1, pp. 105–116.
NASA-DoD Lead-Free Electronics Project Joint Test Report—Final, December 2011, http://teerm.nasa.gov/nasa_dodleadfreeelectronics_proj2.htm

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 1

Coffin–Manson fatigue life curves for SAC solder

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 2

Comparison of uniaxial compression test UCPD model predictions (solid lines) with experimental data (symbols) for SAC396. Numbers in figure are test temperature and nominal engineering strain rates.

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 3

Finite element model of one-fourth of a small 0603 resistor on 1.5748 mm thick FR-4 printed wiring board

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 4

Temperature history used for simulation

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 5

Inelastic strain rate history at points A, B, and C (see Fig. 7(a) for Point locations) in the solder joint

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 6

Damage predicted at three different locations in solder joint with acceleration factors of 1, 50, and 600. Locations of Points A, B, and C are shown in Fig. 7(a).

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 7

Contour plots of damage in the solder joint after 1200 thermal cycles

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 8

Local model predictions for cycles needed to initiate and grow cracks to failure (electrical open) are mesh dependent

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 9

Element size dependent model (Eq. (21)) predicted cycles to initiate and grow cracks to failure (electrical open)

Grahic Jump Location
Fig. 10

CLCC-20 model and contour plots of solder life showing crack extent at 350 and electrical open at 1,150 cycles. Arrow shows end of crack extent.

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In