0
Research Papers

An Experimental and Computational Study on Moisture Induced Epoxy Swelling in Non-hermetic Optoelectronic Packages

[+] Author and Article Information
Sushma Madduri, Bahgat.G Sammakia

Department of Mechanical Engineering,  State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902

William Infantolino

Integrated Electronics Engineering Center (IEEC),  State University of New York at Binghamton, Binghamton, NY 13902

J. Electron. Packag 134(1), 011007 (Mar 19, 2012) (7 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4005911 History: Received April 27, 2011; Revised January 03, 2012; Published March 07, 2012; Online March 19, 2012

Moisture induced epoxy swelling is a potential failure mechanism in nonhermetic packages. Epoxy materials used in the package absorb moisture and swell in a relatively humid environment. This will result in hygroscopic stresses in the material that can eventually lead to failure. The coefficient of hygroscopic swelling (CHS) is a material property that characterizes moisture induced swelling in the material. It is defined as the ratio of hygroscopic strain to the moisture concentration in the material. Prior research investigated the measurement of CHS experimentally using techniques such as thermo mechanical analysis (TMA) (Ardebili , 2003, “Hygroscopic Swelling and Sorption Characteristics of Epoxy Molding Compounds Used in Electronic Packaging,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol., 26 (1), pp. 206–214; Mckague , 1978, “Swelling and Glass Transition Relations for epoxy Matrix Material in Humid Environments,” J. Appl. Polym. Sci., 22 , pp. 1643–1654.), Moiré interferometry (Han , 2003, “Measurement of the Hygroscopic Swelling Coefficient in Mold Compounds Using Moire Interferometer Experimental Techniques,” IEEE Trans. Compon. Packag. Technol., 27 (4), pp. 40–44), and digital image correlation (DIC) (Park and Zhang, 2007, “Investigation of Hygroscopic swelling of Polymers in Freezing Temperature,” ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition). Some of these studies recommended investigation of improved measurement techniques, while others made some procedural assumptions that may not be applicable for all materials. One of the goals of this study was to investigate an improved technique for CHS measurement and helps to better understand the various factors that affect the measurement. The DIC technique was used to measure the moisture swelling of the epoxy material considered for use in the package. Moisture loss during the measurement results in a change in moisture concentration in the sample. While it may be thought that the moisture loss during the DIC scan can be assumed negligible due to the short test time compared with other methods, this assumption did not hold well for the current epoxy material. The ramp rate chosen for the test affects the moisture loss. It introduces a level of nonuniformity in temperature and moisture distribution in the sample. A suitable value that takes into account both of these effects was determined. The moisture loss measured during the DIC scan was accounted for in the CHS computation. In addition to this, the temperature and concentration dependence of the CHS was determined. Results indicated that the temperature and concentration effects are small for the current test material within the test temperature range. The moisture loss found during the DIC measurement leads to a nonuniform moisture distribution in the sample. This was characterized by using experimental and computational methods and the effect on the measurement was determined.

Copyright © 2012 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Strain data calculated from DIC measurements for saturated and dry samples

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Hygroscopic strain as a function of temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Percent moisture content as a function of temperature throughout the DIC scan

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

CHS as a function of temperature

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 11

CHS versus temperature for all three initial saturation conditions

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 12

Temperature dependence of CHS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 13

Moisture concentration dependence of CHS

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 14

Weight loss data as a function of time

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 15

Diffusivity measurement curve fit to Arrhenius equation

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 16

Moisture distribution in the sample, %C

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 17

Stress distribution in the epoxy sample, MPa

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

DIC experimental set up

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Comparison of sample temperature profiles from numerical analysis and experiment

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Temperature distribution across the sample in degree Kelvin

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Maximum temperature difference in the sample as a function of ramp rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Moisture loss as a function of ramp rate

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Specimen deformation recorded with the DIC system

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In