0
Journal of Electronic Packaging | Volume 132 | Issue 4 | Technical Brief
Technical Briefs

Effects of the Thermocompression Bonding on the Microstructure and Contact Resistance for the Ultrafine Pitch Chip-on-Glass Packaging With Nonconductive Film

[+] Author and Article Information
Jianhua Zhang

Key Laboratory of Advanced Display and System Applications of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University, No. 149 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, P.R. China; School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, No. 149 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, P.R. China

Jinsong Zhang

School of Mechatronics Engineering and Automation, Shanghai University, No. 149 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, P.R. China

Lianqiao Yang1

Key Laboratory of Advanced Display and System Applications of Ministry of Education, Shanghai University, No. 149 Yanchang Road, Shanghai, P.R. Chinayanglianqiao@shu.edu.cn

1

Corresponding author.

J. Electron. Packag 132(4), 044501 (Dec 03, 2010) (6 pages) doi:10.1115/1.4002898 History: Received February 24, 2010; Revised September 24, 2010; Published December 03, 2010; Online December 03, 2010
Article
References
Figures
Tables
Citing Articles

Nonconductive film (NCF) is a challenging potential material to substitute the application of anisotropic conductive film in the ultrafine pitch chip-on-glass (COG) packaging. The NCF interconnection requires a high bonding temperature and pressure to form joints, and this causes new reliability concerns. This study investigated effects of the thermocompression bonding parameters on the microstructure and geometric size in the joints to a COG module packaged with NCF. The results revealed that the high temperature and pressure compressed the joints to become wider and shorter. A dual layer of intermetallic compounds consisting of AuSn2 (ε phase) and AuSn4 (η phase) was found in each joint. They were the two kinds of interphases with different melting points (AuSn2:309°C and AuSn4:257°C) during the interfacial reaction between Au and Sn. At the low temperature (below the melting point), the high pressure induced the residual inner stress to generate the cracks in the joints, and this also increased the contact resistance of the joints. The contact resistance increased with the pressure elevating at the same temperature and with the temperature degrading at the same pressure. In the COG packaging with NCF, a proper elevating of the bonding temperature could produce a stable direct connection with the low contact resistance.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2010 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
+A COG module with different interconnections using (a) ACF and (b) NCF
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
A COG module with different interconnections using (a) ACF and (b) NCF
Figure 1

A COG module with different interconnections using (a) ACF and (b) NCF

Grahic Jump Location
+A schematic diagram of the COG module
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
A schematic diagram of the COG module
Figure 2

A schematic diagram of the COG module

Grahic Jump Location
+The Au/Sn bumps and the ITO tracks fabrication
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The Au/Sn bumps and the ITO tracks fabrication
Figure 3

The Au/Sn bumps and the ITO tracks fabrication

Grahic Jump Location
+The flow chart for the thermocompression bonding process
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The flow chart for the thermocompression bonding process
Figure 4

The flow chart for the thermocompression bonding process

Grahic Jump Location
+The size changes of the cross section with different thermocompression bonding parameters: (a) the average width and (b) the average height
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The size changes of the cross section with different thermocompression bonding parameters: (a) the average width and (b) the average height
Figure 5

The size changes of the cross section with different thermocompression bonding parameters: (a) the average width and (b) the average height

Grahic Jump Location
+SEM images of joints with different bonding parameters: (a) at 210°C/85 MPa, (b) at 210°C/115 MPa, (c) at 250°C/85 MPa, and (d) at 250°C/115 MPa
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
SEM images of joints with different bonding parameters: (a) at 210°C/85 MPa, (b) at 210°C/115 MPa, (c) at 250°C/85 MPa, and (d) at 250°C/115 MPa
Figure 6

SEM images of joints with different bonding parameters: (a) at 210°C/85 MPa, (b) at 210°C/115 MPa, (c) at 250°C/85 MPa, and (d) at 250°C/115 MPa

Grahic Jump Location
+Different compositions in the Au–Sn IMCs layer of a joint with 250°C/115 MPa: (a) two types of Au-Sn IMCs, (b) Au–Sn alloy phase diagram, (c) alloy compositions of AuSn2 phase, and (d) alloy compositions of AuSn4 phase
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Different compositions in the Au–Sn IMCs layer of a joint with 250°C/115 MPa: (a) two types of Au-Sn IMCs, (b) Au–Sn alloy phase diagram, (c) alloy compositions of AuSn2 phase, and (d) alloy compositions of AuSn4 phase
Figure 7

Different compositions in the Au–Sn IMCs layer of a joint with 250°C/115 MPa: (a) two types of Au-Sn IMCs, (b) Au–Sn alloy phase diagram, (c) alloy compositions of AuSn2 phase, and (d) alloy compositions of AuSn4 phase

Grahic Jump Location
+A COG module for the four-point resistance measurement
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
A COG module for the four-point resistance measurement
Figure 8

A COG module for the four-point resistance measurement

Grahic Jump Location
+The contact resistance and IMC thickness versus the bonding parameters
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
The contact resistance and IMC thickness versus the bonding parameters
Figure 9

The contact resistance and IMC thickness versus the bonding parameters

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Control and Operational Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines> Chapter 5
Scope of Section I, Organization, and Service Limits
Power Boilers> Chapter 1
Combined Cycle Power Plant
Energy and Power Generation Handbook> Chapter 27
Example Open-Book Questions
Quick Guide to the API 570 - Certified Pipework Inspector Syllabus> Chapter 14
Thermodynamic Performance
Closed-Cycle Gas Turbines> Chapter 6
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In