A Study of Deformation Mechanism During Nanoindentation Creep in Tin-Based Solder Balls

[+] Author and Article Information
Tadahiro Shibutani

 Yokohama University, 79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya, Yokohama, Kanagawa 240-8501, Japanshibu@swan.me.ynu.ac.jp

Qiang Yu, Masaki Shiratori

 Yokohama University, 79-5 Tokiwadai, Hodogaya, Yokohama, Kanagawa 240-8501, Japan

J. Electron. Packag 129(1), 71-75 (May 12, 2006) (5 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2429712 History: Received November 14, 2005; Revised May 12, 2006

As the shrinkage and integration of devices, the creep behavior of tin-based alloys becomes important with microscales. In this paper, the behavior of creep deformation in solder alloys during a nanoindentation test was examined. Nanoindentation creep test was carried out for tin-based solder balls. Obtained results summarized as follows: (i) The stress exponent for power-law creep estimated can be evaluated from the evolution of hardness. These values obtained in the early stage corresponds with that of bulk within the range of high strain rate. (ii) The stress sensitivity decreases after stress relaxation in nanoindentation creep tests. The saturated value is 1 in three solder balls. (iii) The morphology of indented surface consists of three parts: initial indentation, power-law creep, and granular surface. It suggests that the transition from power-law creep to diffusion creep takes place. (iv) Finite element method analysis reveals stress and strain concentration appears in the vicinity of the tip. Strain field remains self-similar as the indentation proceeds. (v) The gradient of triaxial stresses below the tip in a nanoindentation test accelerates the creep strain rate due to the diffusive flow, relatively.

Copyright © 2007 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.



Grahic Jump Location
Figure 1

Schematic illustration of indentation curve

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 2

Analysis model for solder ball and indenter

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 3

Relationships between hardness and holding time in experimental and computational indentations

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 4

Evolution of hardness during tests and transition of hardness sensitivity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 5

Morphology of indented surface

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 6

Drop of Young’s modulus measured from tests after the transition of stress sensitivity

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 7

Distribution of normalized equivalent stress in P=10mN

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 8

Distribution of equivalent strain rate in P=10mN

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 9

Transition of stress sensitivity for nanoindentation creep test

Grahic Jump Location
Figure 10

Distribution of hydrostatic stress near the indenter tip




Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In