0
Journal of Electronic Packaging | Volume 128 | Issue 1 | Research Paper
RESEARCH PAPERS

A Model for Flow Bypass and Tip Leakage in Pin Fin Heat Sinks

[+] Author and Article Information
M. Baris Dogruoz1

Experimental and Computational Heat Transfer Group, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721mbd@tx.fluent.com

Alfonso Ortega

Experimental and Computational Heat Transfer Group, Department of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, The University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ 85721ortega@u.arizona.edu

Russell V. Westphal

Department of Mechanical and Materials Engineering, Washington State University, Tri-Cities, Richland, WA 99354westphal@wsu.edu

1

Presently at Fluent Inc.

J. Electron. Packag 128(1), 53-60 (Jul 30, 2005) (8 pages) doi:10.1115/1.2159009 History: Received October 24, 2004; Revised July 30, 2005
Article
References
Figures
Citing Articles

A model for the pressure drop and heat transfer behavior of heat sinks with top bypass is presented. In addition to the characteristics of a traditional two-branch bypass model, the physics of tip leakage are taken into consideration. The total flow bypass is analyzed in terms of flow that is completely diverted and flow that enters the heat sink but leaks out. Difference formulations of the momentum and the energy equations were utilized to model the problem in the flow direction. Traditional hydraulic resistance and heat transfer correlations for infinitely long tube bundles were used to close the equations. Tip leakage mechanisms were modeled by introducing momentum equations in the flow normal direction in both the pin side and bypass channel, with ad hoc assumptions about the static pressure distribution in that direction. Although the model is applicable to any kind of heat sink, as a case study, results are presented for in-line square pin fin heat sinks. Results were compared with the predictions from a two-branch bypass model and previous experimental data. It is shown that tip leakage effects are important in setting the overall pressure drop at moderate and high pin spacing, but have only minor influence on heat transfer.
FIGURES IN THIS ARTICLE
<>
Copyright © 2006 by American Society of Mechanical Engineers
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
+Flow visualization of a heat sink with top bypass flow, PL=2.0, H/df=14.0, CL=0.5
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Flow visualization of a heat sink with top bypass flow, PL=2.0, H/df=14.0, CL=0.5
Figure 1

Flow visualization of a heat sink with top bypass flow, PL=2.0, H/df=14.0, CL=0.5

Grahic Jump Location
+Illustration of the flow passing through a heat sink with top bypass duct
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Illustration of the flow passing through a heat sink with top bypass duct
Figure 2

Illustration of the flow passing through a heat sink with top bypass duct

Grahic Jump Location
+Illustration of a sample heat sink geometry with a top bypass channel. (a) side-view; (b) top-view
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Illustration of a sample heat sink geometry with a top bypass channel. (a) side-view; (b) top-view
Figure 3

Illustration of a sample heat sink geometry with a top bypass channel. (a) side-view; (b) top-view

Grahic Jump Location
+Control volumes for the finned and the bypass sections in the theoretical model
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Control volumes for the finned and the bypass sections in the theoretical model
Figure 4

Control volumes for the finned and the bypass sections in the theoretical model

Grahic Jump Location
+Overall pressure drop, ΔP vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=2.238 at uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Overall pressure drop, ΔP vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=2.238 at uapp=4m∕s
Figure 5

Overall pressure drop, ΔP vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=2.238 at uapp=4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Overall pressure drop, ΔP vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=3.917 at uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Overall pressure drop, ΔP vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=3.917 at uapp=4m∕s
Figure 6

Overall pressure drop, ΔP vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=3.917 at uapp=4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=2.238 at CL=1.0 and uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=2.238 at CL=1.0 and uapp=4m∕s
Figure 7

Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=2.238 at CL=1.0 and uapp=4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=2.238 at CL=2.0 and uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=2.238 at CL=2.0 and uapp=4m∕s
Figure 8

Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=2.238 at CL=2.0 and uapp=4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=3.917 at CL=1.0 and uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=3.917 at CL=1.0 and uapp=4m∕s
Figure 9

Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=3.917 at CL=1.0 and uapp=4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=3.917 at CL=2.0 and uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=3.917 at CL=2.0 and uapp=4m∕s
Figure 10

Variation of u, ub, vH with respect to x for PL=3.917 at CL=2.0 and uapp=4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Thermal resistance, Rth vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=2.238 at uapp=2,4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Thermal resistance, Rth vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=2.238 at uapp=2,4m∕s
Figure 11

Thermal resistance, Rth vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=2.238 at uapp=2,4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Thermal resistance, Rth vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=3.917 at uapp=2,4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Thermal resistance, Rth vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=3.917 at uapp=2,4m∕s
Figure 12

Thermal resistance, Rth vs clearance ratio, CL for PL=3.917 at uapp=2,4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Variation of bypass ratio, BR and leakage ratio, LR with respect to PL for CL=1.0 at uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Variation of bypass ratio, BR and leakage ratio, LR with respect to PL for CL=1.0 at uapp=4m∕s
Figure 13

Variation of bypass ratio, BR and leakage ratio, LR with respect to PL for CL=1.0 at uapp=4m∕s

Grahic Jump Location
+Variation of bypass ratio, BR and leakage ratio, LR with respect to PL for CL=2.0 at uapp=4m∕s
View Large  |  Save Figure  |  Download Slide (.ppt)
Variation of bypass ratio, BR and leakage ratio, LR with respect to PL for CL=2.0 at uapp=4m∕s
Figure 14

Variation of bypass ratio, BR and leakage ratio, LR with respect to PL for CL=2.0 at uapp=4m∕s

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Aerodynamic Performance Analysis
Axial-Flow Compressors> Chapter 9
Natural Gas Transmission
Pipeline Design & Construction: A Practical Approach, Third Edition> Chapter 3
Adding Surface While Minimizing Downtime
Heat Exchanger Engineering Techniques> Chapter 16
Introduction
Thermal Management of Microelectronic Equipment> Chapter 1
Extended Surfaces
Thermal Management of Microelectronic Equipment> Chapter 8
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In