0
TECHNICAL PAPERS

Stresses and Fracture at the Chip/Underfill Interface in Flip-Chip Assemblies

[+] Author and Article Information
Ji Eun Park

Lockheed Martin Aeronautics Company, Marietta, GA 30063-0915e-mail: ji.e.park@lmco.com

Iwona Jasiuk

The GWW School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 30332-0405e-mail: iwona.jasiuk@me.gatech.edu

Alek Zubelewicz

Structure/Property Relations Group, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545e-mail: alek@lanl.gov

J. Electron. Packag 125(1), 44-52 (Mar 14, 2003) (9 pages) doi:10.1115/1.1527656 History: Received December 20, 2001; Online March 14, 2003
Copyright © 2003 by ASME
Your Session has timed out. Please sign back in to continue.

References

Figures

Grahic Jump Location
Sketches of four different flip chip models—(a) bi-material strip, (b) three-layer case I (three layers with equal lengths), (c) three-layer case II (three layers with long substrate and a straight line of underfill edge), (d) three-layer case III (three layers with underfill fillet starting at the top of chip)
Grahic Jump Location
Finite element meshes of three different models—(a) bi-material strip, (b) three-layer case I (three layers with equal lengths), (c) three-layer case III (three layers with underfill fillet starting at the top of chip)
Grahic Jump Location
Effective properties of underfill versus volume fraction of particles in underfill—(a) effective Young’s modulus E*, (b) effective Poisson’s ratio ν*, (c) effective coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE) α*
Grahic Jump Location
The parameter λ versus volume fraction of particles in underfill for a bi-material strip with a straight edge (shown in Fig. 2(a))
Grahic Jump Location
Deformed shape of the three-layer model II with displacement magnification factor 15.4 (shown in Fig. 2(c))
Grahic Jump Location
Stresses at the chip/underfill interface for a bi-material strip with volume fraction of particles in underfill f=0.4—(a) interfacial normal stress, (b) interfacial shear stress
Grahic Jump Location
Stresses at the chip/underfill interface for a three-layer model with underfill fillet starting at the top of chip (three-layer case III) with volume fraction of particles in underfill f=0.4—(a) interfacial normal stress, (b) interfacial shear stress
Grahic Jump Location
Maximum interfacial stresses versus volume fraction of particles in underfill for bi-material strip and three-layer cases I, II, and III—(a) interfacial normal stress, (b) interfacial shear stress
Grahic Jump Location
The J-integral paths—(a) bi-material strip and three-layer case I and II, (b) three-layer case III
Grahic Jump Location
J-integral versus volume fraction of particles in underfill for four geometric models
Grahic Jump Location
Phase angle versus volume fraction of particles in underfill
Grahic Jump Location
Stress intensity factors K1,K2, and modulus |K| versus volume fraction of particles in underfill

Tables

Errata

Discussions

Some tools below are only available to our subscribers or users with an online account.

Related Content

Customize your page view by dragging and repositioning the boxes below.

Related Journal Articles
Related eBook Content
Topic Collections

Sorry! You do not have access to this content. For assistance or to subscribe, please contact us:

  • TELEPHONE: 1-800-843-2763 (Toll-free in the USA)
  • EMAIL: asmedigitalcollection@asme.org
Sign In